Were there stories I wrote along the way that were terrible clinkers? God, yes. But they were all a product of their time, and I did the best I could.
The bottom line always remains the same: What is the basic humanity of the character? How do I make them resonate with the reader?
I've always thought of myself as an organic writer, rather than a cerebral one. I feel my way along as I go, hoping I'll get to the place I intend to reach.
I try not to violate what came before me and to leave lots of wiggle room for those who will follow.
I've never sat down and thought about the difference between plot and theme. To me, that's never been important.
When I'm my own editor, there's very little difference between the first draft and the final. I write what feels right to begin with. I rarely make any major changes.
I was a very sickly kid. While I was in the hospital at age 7, my Dad brought me a stack of comic books to keep me occupied. I was hooked.
The most unrealistic thing I've ever read in comics is when some group of characters calls themselves the Brotherhood of Evil or the Masters of Evil. I don't believe any character believes their goals to be truly evil.
People who were more concerned with themselves and looking good to their readers then they were with the characters sacrificed a series for the sake of a story.
Unfortunately, there are writers whose only concern is how good they could make themselves look on a title.
In general, shorter is better. If you can encapsulate your idea into a single captivating sentence, you're halfway home.