Say thanks by supporting us!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisement to our visitors. Please consider supporting to us by disabling your ad blocker.

Processing...

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

logo
Related Quote
Show all

More die in the United States of too much food than of too little.

Politics is the art of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable.

In economics, hope and faith coexist with great scientific pretension and also a deep desire for respectability.

You will find that the State is the kind of organization which, though it does big things badly, does small things badly, too.

People who are in a fortunate position always attribute virtue to what makes them so happy.

The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.

It has been the acknowledged right of every Marxist scholar to read into Marx the particular meaning that he himself prefers and to treat all others with indignation.

We all agree that pessimism is a mark of superior intellect.

War remains the decisive human failure.

Showcase
Show all

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.

It would be foolish to suggest that government is a good custodian of aesthetic goals. But, there is no alternative to the state.