I like cartoons. I like 'Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends.' It's funny! It has things that kids wouldn't get. It's like, if you're mature, you get it. I like that and 'The Fairly OddParents.'
Well, for one thing, the executives in charge at Cartoon Network are cartoon fans. I mean, these are people who grew up loving animation and loving cartoons, and the only difference between them and me is they don't know how to draw.
I'm not up on today's television for children, because it's mostly cartoons that don't seem to interest me.
In television writing, you want to hear what the characters say as opposed to giving them something to say. It's the same with the cartoons.
Editorial cartoons should be smart and substantive, provocative and informative. They should stir passions and deep emotions. Editorial cartoons should be the catalyst for thought, and frankly speaking, if you can make politicians think, that is an accomplishment itself.
Editorial cartoons are about concept. The illustration is merely a vehicle to convey a point of view. We're here to protect and inform the public, to attack and repel those who do not agree with our long-term shared interest.
As crime writers, we put these characters, year after year, book after book, through the most horrendous trauma, dealing with grief and death and loss and violence. We can't pretend that these things don't affect these characters; they have to. If they don't, then you're essentially writing cartoons.
I don't think there's more than half-a-dozen cartoons that I've been really truly happy with in all the time I've been doing it.
Most sitcoms and cartoons, especially, you can rely on, because they go back to square one at the beginning of every episode.
I've never really thought about competing with cartoons. If it ever gets to that point, then just shoot me.
If you're going to make a musical, don't cartoon it from the play. Make it better than the play. Have a reason for making it sing.