Controversy is only dreaded by the advocates of error.

If we destroy human rights and rule of law in the response to terrorism, they have won.

The unspoken thing, the elephant in the room, is the war against terrorism, it's tainting everything.

But it then very soon became clear that the response of a war against terrorism, initially conceived of in a metaphorical sense, began to be taken increasingly seriously and came to entail waging a real war.

It is necessary to name the enemy of human civilization, and this enemy is international terrorism associated with religious fundamentalism and religious intolerance.

Terrorism has come to publishing. It is a grave concern when criticism is turned to mortal threats.

Markets rebounded quickly from morning jitters after the London Thursday terrorist bombing.

An error doesn't become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.

Damascus is the center of world terror. All these organizations, Jihad and Hamas, their headquarters are in Damascus. Syria supports Hezbollah.

Football is a game of errors. The team that makes the fewest errors in a game usually wins.

The key battleground in the war on terrorism, therefore, is in the minds of the American public.

The FBI assesses HVEs are the greatest terrorism threat to the homeland.

Islamist terrorism is a cancer on Islam, and Muslims themselves must fight it at our side.

Terrorism needs to be fought against and certainly delegitimized or attacked, but some of the underlying grievances that might in fact lead individuals astray to terrorism cannot be ignored.

Ministers may not be responsible for administrative errors, but they are responsible for major policy blunders.

We've investigated Chattanooga as a terror attack from the beginning.

If U.S. occupation is a primary recruitment tool and what inspires Islamic terrorists, are many of our current efforts overseas actually fighting terrorism and diminishing the threat?

I think about terrorism in terms of popcorn. You can't tell which kernels are popcorn and which are not, but you assume you'll always have some kernels that are going to pop.

Terrorism is contempt for human dignity.

The people of New Hampshire want someone in the U.S. Senate with clear, concise views on terrorism. They'll judge a congressman based on the people he associates with, his voting record, and his campaign contributions.