There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns reduce crime.

The most anyone could reasonably say about institutional racism is that the 'evidence is far from conclusive.

Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious.

Evidence from mobile devices has provided critical help in solving crimes ranging from homicides to drug trafficking.

Power is not sufficient evidence of truth.

After hearing the evidence, I will record a verdict of natural causes.

I have no record of racism or antisemitism, there is no evidence to support it, not even a shred of evidence.

Our duty is to believe that for which we have sufficient evidence, and to suspend our judgment when we have not.

Despite the fact that there was not one shred of evidence that George Zimmerman 'racially profiled' Trayvon Martin, America's liberals have literally taken to the streets to denounce a verdict that was, by all accounts, a just one.

Here before us was sufficient evidence to show that it really was an entrance to a tomb, and by the seals, to all outward appearances that it was intact.

In the absence of evidence, superstition. It's a Middle Ages thing. That's my theory anyway.

I suppose we are what we are, and we use the evidence to confirm what we believe.

For Aristotle, habits reigned supreme. The behaviors that occur unthinkingly are the evidence of our truest selves.

Extraordinary allegations require extraordinary evidence.

No apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

Even now there is no evidence that anyone involved in the Nixon operation was going to threaten us.

There is no evidence that super PACs have led to a greater percentage of negative ads.

It has yet to be shown by direct biochemical methods, as opposed to the indirect genetic evidence mentioned earlier, that the code is indeed a triplet code.

The real evidence is not practically speaking in scholarship but in how Jesus and the Christianity based on him manifest themselves in the lives of practising Christians. Their lives are the proofs of their beliefs.

In the 1960s and '70s, there wasn't much evidence at all. We knew vaguely the causes of cancer, but methods like genomics were very new.