It seems as though our leaders have almost forgotten about legal immigration and are just leaving our borders open, which is a detriment culturally, financially, and in a lot of other realms for native people.

People who think that the immigration system is easy and people should just apply legally - it just isn't that easy.

The BJP has a zero-tolerance policy towards terrorism and is determined to equip the Indian armed forces with modern and hi-tech equipment and take steps to restrict illegal immigration.

I believe on the issue of immigration, you have to deal with it sensibly.

We have got to secure the border and enforce existing immigration laws.

I'm in favor of immigration but we also need rules.

We have to educate our communities about the immigration system and dispel the myths that have been fed to us. Immigration isn't going to go away. A wall isn't going to 'solve' the issue.

What I have always thought is that there should be a proper national conversation about what kind of immigration policies we have.

If black lives mattered, I believe that policing and immigration enforcement would not be the devastating force that it is in our communities.

There is a debate in Ukip as to how strong we should be on the immigration issue. I personally think we should own it.

If voters' anger is the hallmark of the 2016 campaign, nothing has generated that anger as much as the establishment's decade-long duplicity on immigration.

Donald Trump believes in nation-state democracy; Hillary Clinton used the E.U. as a prototype for a larger global union. Donald Trump believes in sensible immigration controls.

Ours is an open and accepting society, and has historically provided an avenue for lawful immigration to all those willing to accept the responsibilities of citizenship.

House Republicans want to pass a strong border security, illegal immigration bill. We want a bill. There is no ifs, ands or buts about it.

Even before the Windrush scandal, it was clear Britain's immigration system was in desperate need of reform.

Legal immigration should emphasize merit and meeting the needs of the U.S., including specific unmet workforce needs.

Mitt Romney's primary season embrace of the social and economic agenda of the more rabid elements of his party doomed him, especially the shrill immigration rhetoric and the harshly insensitive theory that no additional sacrifice or contribution should be sought from those at the top.

When you have a system that increases border security funding by about 300 percent, and it only increases funding for immigration courts by 70 percent, you have a disaster.

I ask unanimous consent that I be able to deliver a floor speech on immigration reform in Spanish.

Immigration reform almost happened under President George W. Bush. Twice. And it was comprehensive.