That's the problem with very high taxes - they don't redistribute wealth; they redistribute people.

Sharad Pawar is paying tax.

Contrary to the myth that Mr. Bush cut taxes only for the wealthy, the 2001 tax cut reduced taxes for every income-tax payer in the country.

Every tax or rate, forcibly taken from an unwilling person, is immoral and oppressive.

What I want to do is create more taxpayers, not more taxes.

There is no such thing as a good tax.

Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery.

Provision of facilities to the masses is linked with the collection of taxes.

I didn't pay my taxes for years.

The difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is the thickness of a prison wall.

Don't allow politically connected folks to get their particular tax breaks.

When President George W. Bush cut taxes, he cut them for everyone.

Taxes and fees in Chicago and Cook County are forcing low-income families like the one I grew up in out of this city. It's clear we can't keep treating low-income and middle-class families like an ATM machine with no limit.

In the European context tax rates are high and government expenditure is focused on current expenditure. A 'good' consolidation is one where taxes are lower and the lower government expenditure is on infrastructures and other investments.

The wealthiest can afford to pay more in taxes. That's a part of the deal. That makes sense. I don't know anyone that doesn't agree with that.

Reagan has turned America into a tax haven.

When, as an individual, you are not paying taxes, it is evasion. As a corporate, it is legal shrewdness or tax engineering.

My opponents attitude is, 'If it moves, tax it, if it keeps moving, regulate it and when it stops, subsidize it.

President Bush has a record of cutting taxes, has provided a prescription drug benefit for seniors, has upheld the Second Amendment and remains committed to stopping liberal activists judges who are redefining marriage.

That's the biggest problem, is the tax code itself.